I figured I'd get a "rise" out of you! Thanks for not disappointing me! :-D Avery At 03:43 PM 3/31/2007, you wrote: >And the answer is... that Steinway likes their own sound and their >own transition... and a lot of other people do too. Yamaha gave up >trying to get the Steinway sound a while back because they decided >they actually were quite happy with the way their CF III and S >series were developing. Plus the fact that there is considerable >social/business inertia that impedes any major change in such an >organization. I do not buy Davids or Dales claim that it makes a >qualitative /improvement/ because that is purely a matter of >subjective taste... period. It makes a qualitative /change/ that >some may like and some will not. And if enough do like it.. then it >will make an impact that will cause a change in the industry. If >not... well then it wont. Dispassionate as hell... but the bloody >truth of the matter. > >Cheers >RicB > > > David/Dale, > > My question is if it makes that much improvement, > why doesn't Steinway? I know the answer. I just > want to see what you two say! :-D > > Avery -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20070331/dbf550cf/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC