pianotech Digest, Vol 868, Issue 3

[gordon stelter]

Another way of looking at it is this....
  While scientific measurements may help explain one
particular aspect of soundboard function, does that
mean that this is all that is at work ?
     I think not. 
    

     G



--- Richard Brekne <ricbrek@broadpark.no> wrote:

> ????????   Whilst I aggree basically with David also
> on this point...
> thinking that reply was equally useless.... I find
> it suprising at best
> to find this particular broadside aggreeable...
> considering the many
> nearly identical posts I've seen through the years
> thrown out.... indeed
> many times with a humourous twinge... but sometimes
> not.  Lets remember
> who we are here... :)
> Cheers
> RicB
> 
> >
> > Subject:
> > RE: circle of sound
> > From:
> > Ron Nossaman <rnossaman@cox.net>
> >
> >
> >
> >>> And the point is?
> >>
> >>
> >> If you cannot hear it, there is no point trying
> to explain.
> >>
> >> Horace
> >
> >
> >
> > Horace,
> > I agree with David. This nonsense of making a
> casual pseudo-profound 
> > "point" with vague hints, references, and
> disconnected phenomena when 
> > others are attempting (and expected) to make
> rational physics based 
> > connections and explain in often ridiculous detail
> as every word of 
> > the explanation is dissected at the molecular
> level, is not 
> > acceptable. Explain it, please, or retract it.
> This is just the kind 
> > of counterproductive crap that has kept
> understanding of soundboard 
> > function at the Voodoo and incense level for the
> last three hundred 
> > years.
> >
> > Pardon the vent, I'm just very tired of it and you
> happened to get on 
> > my last nerve.
> >
> > Ron N
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pianotech list info:
> https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250