This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment If you go to http://www.westsystem.com and click on "Product = Information" and then "Typical Physical Properties" you will get a bunch = of info describing tensile and compressive strengths and hardness of = West System epoxies. I would imagine CA manufacturers might have similar = data on their products. Anyone seeking info on epoxy really should spend some time on the West = System web site. It is packed with all sorts of info. I find myself = constantly going back to it to check various details or look for an idea = when faced with an application dilemma. Terry Farrell ----- Original Message -----=20 From: David Love=20 To: 'Pianotech'=20 Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 3:41 PM Subject: RE: CA glue Maybe harder isn't the best way to express it. Resistance to = compression is what I'm thinking of. While in the case of a loose = bridge pin where the space is very small CA seems to work fine (though I = think epoxy is better assuming you have a way of delivering it) CA is = not really designed for "gap filling" in spite of the label on the = bottle. =20 David Love davidlovepianos@comcast.net=20 -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] On = Behalf Of Carl Meyer Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:33 AM To: Pianotech Subject: Re: CA glue =20 =20 David, I'm not sure I agree with you about epoxy being harder than ca. = I have used both ca and epoxy to fill rather small cracks in = soundboards. I don't recall, but I think the ca was the gap filling = one. =20 I would put masking tape on each side of the crack and fill so that = the filler would be tape thickness higher than the wood. =20 I would then scrape to level the surface. It was a pain to scrape the = ca because it was so hard that it dulled my scraper. =20 =20 That said, I think both ca and epoxy are wonderful products and have = many uses. There are also many opportunities to screw up with them. = DAMHIK. =20 It seems that ca and epoxy adhere to each other very well. I know a = tech that will seal the top of a crack with a white (tinted) epoxy = paste, then turn the piano on its back and fill the bottom with ca. I = don't know the thickness of the ca he uses. I think I would prefer a = thin epoxy on the bottom. =20 Carl Meyer Ptg assoc Santa Clara, Ca. =20 =20 =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: David Love=20 To: 'Pianotech'=20 Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 7:39 PM Subject: RE: CA glue =20 For larger bridge cracks and repairs I prefer epoxy. It is better = at gap filling, cures harder and has better adhesion properties. I = prefer CA glue for securing loose bridge pins or when the cracks are = hairline and you need wicking properties. I wouldn't expect either to = fail if you didn't use the material beyond what it was designed for. CA = glue on loose tuning pins is hard to predict since the pin is being = moved periodically, however, I have used this repair on several = occasions and have not had a problem even after several years. =20 David Love davidlovepianos@comcast.net=20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] = On Behalf Of Chris Henke Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 8:17 AM To: Pianotech Listserv Subject: CA glue =20 These questions should make for some interesting discussion: =20 1) who likes to use CA glue instead of Epoxy for cracked bridges, = and why? =20 2) How long is a cracked bridge repair using CA glue expected to = last? =20 3) How long is a loose tuning pin repair using CA glue expected to = last? =20 Thanks, Chris Henke Portland, Oregon ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/a0/2f/af/06/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC