>The belly is huge with quite short ribs and a light soundboard. Clarification? > I can't verify this, but I believe the crown is also quite low. I haven't been able to find the reference, but I recall reading a Stuart quote to the effect that there "is no crown - doesn't need one". I'd like verification one way or another on this too, if anyone knows. > The whole design makes for a piano that delivers quite interesting > sounds at low to medium volume, but I can't say I enjoyed the fortissimo > and above. This confirmed what I had heard on recordings prior to seeing it. The recording I have is of a piano that very obviously falls apart into distortion at higher attack levels. I don't think it's the hammers blocking from a too flexible action rail. That's a classic low soundboard impedance killer octave sound to my ear, and extends through the entire top half of the instrument. >What I really enjoyed was the pianissimo playing and possibilities - it >has four pedals Damper, sostenuto, una corda and half blow. The >combination of half blow and una corda made for the most delicate and >controlled softs I've ever experienced. In the recording I have, the piano sounds quite nice at low levels. >I also had the recent opportunity to do some servicing on one of Ron Overs >early pianos...given the choice I'd take his home over the Stuart any day >of the week! Just my humble opinion. Mine too. >Looking forward to participating more in the future > >Cheers >Mark Bolsius Thanks Mark, good to hear from you. I hope some day to get a first hand look at one of Stuart's pianos myself. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC