---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment I was never a reallllly big fan of the origional Nordiska... but all in all it was a decent enough sounding and playing instrument... its fatal flaw being an horrible case of weather sickness. But it pains me to see the name being used on the pianos produced now. I have never liked that practice. When a company goes broke... then it does.. and somebody else going in, buying up everything and moving to Timbucktoo to get the local species to plask together something that looks the same and then calling it the same is not exactly my idea of an accurate representation of the true picture. It is said that pianos dont have soul by some.... well.... thats only partly true. RicB BobRussellpiano@aol.com wrote: > List, I've serviced several Nordiskas. The first pianos that were > imported were pretty poor quality. However, the most recent pianos > I've seen are much improved and are a fair value for the money. > However, I consider this a poor choice for an institutional setting. > While they have improved, this is not a good high mileage instrument. > You can expect a lot more problems than with the Kawai. Even though > the price difference is substantial, the Kawai is a slam dunk. > > Bob Russell RPT -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/3a/46/11/35/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC