This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Hi Richard. Thanks for taking time. But ... Ok... this of course changes the situation as you've moved up a bit in = general on SW's and you've got this big bulbous bulge in the middle. = C-3 and C-2 are in the top part of the low SW zone, then C-1 goes up = all the way to top medium (+) and C0 is way the heck up there, and the = curve finishes off just over the dividing line between the high and = medium zones. Assuming this data and the ratio you gave is correct, you = have like two different pianos :)... the bass is set up with low SW's an = a low ratio, and the rest of the piano set up with high SW's and a low = ratio. I would think that would be pretty noticible in both play and = sound really. Again, I would definatly even out this situation before = getting into any needling.=20 I will even out the situation. But still, evenness was not the problem. = I wonder if evening out the SW will cure my real musical problem of = dynamic linearity between P and mF. Don't think so. I think it would be best for you to get a reliable measuring device = like the Stanwood kit, or make something youself, as it's very important = to get dependable data. And it would be fun to get a better sense of how = this instrument is set up.=20 That is sure. I will. But still, do you think those very numbers tell = the whole story ? Cheers=20 RicB=20 Best regards, St=E9phane Collin. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/0a/2e/9f/3c/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC