Veritune

[Greg Newell]

Kent and list,
    Yes TuneLab is a viable option for techs just as TuneLab 97 was. There are enhancements I would suggest you see for yourself at http://www.TuneLab-World.com/  . As the last version was, so is the new in that it does not make assumptions but rather gives a great deal of flexibility for your own tuning style and likes / dislikes. There is a demo that has a nag screen but is otherwise very functional. I have purchased my
copy of TuneLab Pro and at just over $300 it is still the best kept secret and bargain out there IMHO. Regarding the classes on the old version, could anyone afford to tour around and give classes when the price of the program was only $36 and shareware at that? As with any program or platform it's what you like and what your used to. I think TuneLab has always been as useful or more so than any of the others albeit a bit
more techie oriented. You be the judge for yourself.

Greg

Kwkeys@AOL.COM wrote:

> With the recent discussions of Veritune, RCT, and SAT, it brought to mind again the TuneLab program. As I was traveling back from the Penn State Conference today, it occurred to me that I have not seen a class on TuneLab at any of the conferences that I have attended over the years. Has anyone seen any classes given by the writer of TuneLab? or others that represent the program? (My apologies for not remembering his name.
>
> In addition, I understand that there is a new version of TuneLab out- TuneLab Pro. Does this exhibit any substantial enhancements to the prior version? Are features introduced in this version that are similar to RCT? Is this new program a viable consideration for techncians choosing among the slowly expanding field of visual tuning devises?
>
> Thanks for any input from the collective knowledge. Just curious about this, having used RCT and SAT's.
>
> Kent Webb

--
Greg Newell
Greg's Piano Forté
12970 Harlon Ave.
Lakewood, Ohio 44107
216-226-3791
mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net