Friends, Forgive my ignorance, but what would a moderator actually do? I have this perception that a moderator would read every post and forward to the list only those deemed of general interest. Potentially every one of us could get steamed about that, because something *we* thought was of general interest was kicked out by the *big boss.* What form of government would that most resemble? Certainly not democracy. Maybe we are having growing pains. How many people subscribe to the list now, compared with maybe two years ago? I favor moderating ourselves. It would take some energy, but if you feel a post should not be on the list, just send a private message, probably only a single sentence, to the sender. Maybe "Please send such messages privately" or "I feel this doesn't belong on the list." I know if I got a half dozen responses like that toward something I wrote, I would soon consider what I send much more seriously. Regards, Clyde Hollinger Robin Blankenship wrote: > Perhaps a > moderator to keep things focused would be useful.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC