In the case of completely eliminating the aural part of the test; Yes, I am against that. In fact, if they wanted to make the tuning test aural only, I would say OK. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Brekne" <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 6:52 AM Subject: Re: ETD's, calculators and the exam > > > "Kevin E. Ramsey RPT" wrote: > > > Richard,, The way the current test is set up here, is that you must be able > > to tune, ( granted, it's only three octaves.) aurally the center section of > > the piano. I think it's from B2 to C5. Then you're graded using fairly tight > > standards as to A440, stability, etc. For all practical purposes, if you > > aren't a pretty good aural tuner,,you aren't going to pass. Doesn't involve > > using the machine at all. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > I know.. I just took it this summer. Actually felt it could have been a good > deal tougher, but at least it confirmed you had the basic idea of and skills > needed to do an aural tuning. The present discussion is about a proposal to > allow the use of the machine to do the whole test. This of course would reduce > the value of the present test quite a bit. > > > -- > Richard Brekne > RPT, N.P.T.F. > Bergen, Norway > mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC