My chapter is having a difficult time reaching clarity about this proposal. What if there were various classes and exams, as mentioned, but no "endorsement?" One could say "I'm an RPT, and I've passed exams on Inventory Management, Concert Preparation, and so on." One might design one's own curriculum, including , some day, exams on rescaling, action geometry, etc. Would there be value in a system of classes and exams like this? Ed Sutton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cy Shuster" <cy at shusterpiano.com> To: <caut at ptg.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 12:02 AM Subject: Re: [CAUT] CAUT Certification:... > Just as an example, a pilot gets a basic license for single-engine > aircraft, and then adds certificates for instrument flight, multi- engine > aircraft over land, multi-engine sea, private jet, commercial jet, etc. > They distinguish one set of skills from another. > > In the piano hierarchy of skills, there might be a basic nomenclature and > functional knowledge section that applies to everyone, including dealers > and rebuilders, then an add-on for tuner/technicians that gives RPT, > another that gives CAUT, another for rebuilders, and so on. I'm sure > this has been discussed endlessly... > > --Cy-- > > Cy Shuster, RPT > ABQ, NM > www.shusterpiano.com >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC