On Apr 14, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Alan McCoy wrote: > I will be using Ronsen Bacons on it. Reports to follow in a few > months. The > last set of Ronsen Bacon hammers I installed (last summer) were very > good - > consistent thickness and hardness (or softness, your choice) and > weight. > They were firmer than the same hammer from several years back, but > still > needing hardener. But on Del's design? I can well imagine not needing > lacquer. Del's design for a Charles Walter grand uses Bacon hammers. When I played one a couple years ago at a convention, I found it needed some voicing, serious voicing down. I was floored when Del told me they were Bacon and had been voiced somewhat (though he agreed they needed more). My take is that, for a thinner, more responsive board and lower tension scale (like this), you need a softer hammer, a lighter hammer, and a higher action ratio, to get the most out of it. The other end of the spectrum is the Steinway D, which in current iteration seems to need a heavy, hard hammer with low ratio. Pure theory, which makes sense to me, but is untested in the field. Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico fssturm at unm.edu
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC