[CAUT] attachments

[Aaron Bousel]

Hasn't been happening here. Has your provider suddenly started 
handling email differently? Is it only CAUT email? The only 
attachments I've received are "real" attachments, e.g.. the Schimmel photos.
Aaron

At 06:25 PM 11/4/2008, you wrote:

>Since about 6:00pm November 2, nearly every post has carried
>what appears to me to be an utterly useless attachment, where
>prior to that, very few did. Why, and must they? I happen to
>use the attachment flag as an indication that someone has
>intentionally attached something that is presumably considered
>to be of interest (and oddly, often is). When everything in
>the mailbox has the flag, and the attachment carries no useful
>information that isn't already in the address line, the flag
>is rendered effectively useless as a differentiation between
>an attached photo, and 42 nested levels of untrimmed replies
>with html formatting and dancing smiley faces. Is it really
>necessary to arbitrarily kill a useful built in function of
>the mail client with this? This is as obnoxious as the .vcf cards.
>
>Disgruntled mail hostage,
>Ron N
>
>PS: This message was sent WITHOUT attachments of any kind,
>however it arrived.
>
>_______________________________________________
>CAUT mailing list
>CAUT at ptg.org
>http://ptg.org/mailman/listinfo/caut_ptg.org


------------------------------------------
Aaron Bousel
Registered Piano Technician, Piano Technicians Guild
abousel at comcast.net
(413) 253-3846 (voice & fax) 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/attachments/20081104/bdbd5a94/attachment.html