> Well Ron there's nothing really limiting by using a forum structure for the > conversation instead of a list server. The conversation would still exist in > un-digested form. People would choose to reply to a thread or begin a new > one, or not read it at all. The system would not in any way limit what you > see or what you say. You choose what you want to pay attention to, or not, > by subscribing to whatever you want to subscribe to, or not. The > organization of the threads, the conversation, is neither in your control , > nor not in your control. The organization of the conversation reflects the > sensibilities of all who use it, and changes as the community of users see > fit, dynamically and ongoing. I guess I don't get it then. What's the functional difference? > I apologize for misunderstanding you, BTW. When you said, "Kind of like > life. In my experience, organization is possible only when you have all the > information already. " I thought when you said this that you meant that > organization is not possible unless you have all the information already. No foul, no problem. There's always another 42 levels of unspoken detail in any communication. I just thought it was condensed a tad too abruptly. > Of course having two lists such as we do has its own limitations. > > Alan It do, as does everything else. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC