> Not incredible at all, Ron. > There was a time when CAUTS (those that were on-line anyway) were the only > ones who read Pianotech since it was the original CAUT list. > It began as a shared set of e-mail addresses to which we all posted everything > in the days before listservers. Danny L. Boone at Baylor was the one who got > me involved. > The only reason most we left one by one was that the volume of postings (and, > indeed, the volume of what amounted to chatter) increased to the point that > the time investment was too costly in terms of our workload and available > time. > If not for that, Pianotech would still be the CAUT list and we'd all still be > there. > I envy those who have the time to read Pianotech, almost as much as I envy > those who have time to read both lists. > Personally, though, the costs outweigh the benefits... politics > notwithstanding. Yea, that's what I read here. We don't have time to read Pianotech, because it doesn't have anything we want anyway - ascertained by not reading it. Very slick. I must learn how that works some day. This is also, incidentally, chatter. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC