> Regarding some of the recent submissions about applying CA glue to the > bridge pin to eliminate false beats, I was wondering if this treatment > could be compared to applying CA glue to tuning pins? It seems that > from reading some calls and responses that this may be oversimplifying > the physics of the bridge/pin, The physics of the bridge/pin is typically vastly overcomplicated, in my opinion. >but is an origin of false beats loose > bridge pins? It's very likely, observable by touching a screwdriver to the bridge pin and hearing the beat disappear. >Also, are bridge pin holes drilled to a specific depth to > accept the whole length of the pin or are they drilled like tuning pin > holes, allowing space at the bottom.? I've found no detectable tonal benefit to having pins bottomed in the hole, and since bridges change in height with humidity swings, it's not likely possible that the pin will stay bottomed out in any case. >I've been very, very curious to > understand the origin of false beats and how to deal with them certainly. > Thanks in advance for any input, > Joe Wiencek, RPT This has been discussed and described repeatedly in detail on Pianotech for years. It's in the archives. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC