I agree that the numbers do not support the idea of rise and fall of soundboards accounting for more then a basically negligible amount of pitch change. Not only does the vertical displacement necessary for such a change need to be very much larger then we could possibly observe in real pianos... but even moderate vertical displacement changes are accompanied by changes in downbearing to large for the piano to handle. The idea of bridge surface swelling and forcing the strings up the pins and thereby increasing this segments length by virtue of the increase in offset angle the string takes through the pin is interesting... but I would like to point out that if this is to account for pitch changes... then there are two things that simply must be admited. First.. one must admit that strings can indeed climb up bridge pins. Secondly one is forced to admit then that there would be a very uniform graduated affect in pitch change directly related to the overall length of the string. Basically this means that any change in the effective height of the bridge surface that is within reason will have virtually no effect on long strings and the shorter strings would be very much effected. On top of this you still have the problem presented by the increased downbearing that accompanies any given increase in vertical deflection. It matters not whether this deflection comes from a rise in the soundboard or a swelling of the bridge cap. You simply cannot expect the soundboard assembly as a whole to support more then very very moderate levels of string deflection. I posted the math needed to do figure this... math approved in personal correspondance with Dr. Alexander Galembo and myself.. so there should be no reason to question it. And it is not just simple trig... one has to take into account the change in tension that occurs for a given change in deflection all else being equal... and to do that you need to know how to work in the strings elongation into the thing.. you need to work Hook's law into the thing.. according to this the change in tension will be equal to Youngs Modulus X the cross section of the wire X the change in the strings length / the origional length. The <<simple>> trig will only get you the change in length... nothing more. Cheers RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC