[CAUT] Hardness of termination vs string breakage (was Re: restrung D)

Fred Sturm fssturm at unm.edu
Thu Apr 19 10:41:04 MDT 2007


On Apr 18, 2007, at 8:36 PM, Ron Nossaman wrote:

>> Yep, I agree. Sharpness of profile plus angle of deflection. I  
>> don’t think hardness enters into it, unless somebody can show me  
>> how. I don’t see how softer metal would make a sharp profile with  
>> a high angle less apt to string breakage. Maybe it does, but I  
>> don’t understand how.
>> Regards,
>> Fred Sturm
>> University of New Mexico
>
> How about the unlikelihood of a soft capo maintaining the sharp  
> profile, where a hard one would? The hard capo would retain the  
> high breakage profile, while the softer one would blunt into a  
> safer contour.
>
> Ron N
	Yep, that's my take: I think this is why the notion that hardening  
caused string breakage got started. People sharpening capos, finding  
they didn't retain the profile, so then they hardened their sharpened  
capos. The hardened sharp capos experienced somewhat more string  
breakage. Blame the hardening, not the fact that the sharpness of the  
bearing point was more durable. The sharpness caused the extra  
breakage, and in the sharpened, soft capos, the grooving/blunting  
made the sharpness somewhat less, hence somewhat less string  
breakage. Makes sense to me. The notion that the hardness itself  
causes breakage makes no sense at all to me.
	So if you want to sharpen capos, it would make sense to me to do a  
contour a little less sharp, and harden that, rather than do a  
knife's edge and leave it soft. Or just as sharp, hardened, and less  
angle of deflection. But to each his own.
Regards,
Fred Sturm
University of New Mexico
fssturm at unm.edu







More information about the caut mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC