This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Oops- I meant to write backcheck, not damper....that happens more and more = these days. Anyway, it was a great class about backchecks. And the = action geometry is also very good. =20 You could maybe set up a bunch of backcheck problems that way. And it = would be cheaper to buy a Steinway action model (naive thought, there). = The thing about doing it with a full action is that you wouldn't be able = to see it...which is the way these darling problems happen. I guess you = could throw a curtain over the action model. Ed ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Horace Greeley=20 To: College and University Technicians=20 Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 7:30 PM Subject: Re: bobbling hammers, again Hi, Ed, At 06:36 PM 10/2/2003 -0400, you wrote: Hello, Horace, where've you been? Under a rock.... Richard Davenport's damper class is very, very good. It is mostly = about installing new dampers properly. Hmmm - the class I was thinking about was one for which he had built a = special action model with modified parts so that any number of variables = could be achieved. I think it was called: "What if?"...but, memory = fails. What I'm imagining is an action that is rigged to have as many of = the subtle frustrations (such as Wim's backcheck problems) as could be = fitted into 88 keys. The object would be to learn to diagnose quickly, = mostly by touch, without pulling the stack. Richard's model was only one or two keys (I think). =20 I like the idea of a full action, but wonder about the visibility of = the parts/relationships. If anyone has a Steinway action about to be ditched, I would = undertake the rigging! What? Throw away the Crown Jewel of Perfection of piano manufacture? = Get thee behind me! Block my hammer! Still, the visual does have some degree of visceral appeal... Horace Ed Sutton ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Horace Greeley=20 To: College and University Technicians=20 Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:19 AM Subject: Re: bobbling hammers, again Ed, Something on this order used to be a part of a class that Richard = Davenport was teaching a few years back. Perhaps he is still teaching = it from time to time. Horace At 05:28 PM 10/1/2003 -0400, you wrote: If someone has a spare D or B action, it would be a great model = to create all the backcheck problems we've been posting on this thread, = then use in a demo class. =20 Ed S.=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Wimblees@aol.com=20 To: caut@ptg.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 5:06 PM=20 Subject: Re: bobbling hammers, again In a message dated 10/1/03 3:58:02 PM Central Daylight Time, = ed440@mindspring.com writes: Wim- Along with what Jeff is saying, check (feel) if the nap of the = buckskin is=20 reversed, or if the backcheck head is slightly loose on the = wire. Also check the=20 bottom edge and corners of the hammer; just a slight touch = with a sandpaper file=20 to remove a sharp corner might make it work. I am going to look at the wire, to make sure it is tight in the = key. I will also look at the nap of the buckskin. I have already sanded = the bottom edge of the tail to remove the sharp edge.=20 Are you making a laminated checklist of all these suggestions? = You could teach a=20 class next year. Or sell the list. ;-) I am saving all the suggestions for future references. I don't = know if I will have enough material to teach a full class, but maybe a = mini class. As with all educational material, the information will be = free for the asking. :) Wim=20 Ed Sutton ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/8c/9b/38/e0/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC