Workload-"condition"

[Scott Thile]

I actually thought Fred's points were excellent. It is a mistake to ignore
all the work and experience that has gone into our current guidelines
formula, and the guidelines document as a whole. They do work. I have used
them to good advantage here. They can work better, as Fred has pointed out.

I think it makes sense to assume that administrators will look to CAUTs our
outside techs to help them with the technical information they need to
evaluate their inventories and make informed decisions in terms of workload.
Our current formula, once revised, should do that nicely.

Thanks for all your work on this Fred,
Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-caut@ptg.org [mailto:owner-caut@ptg.org]On Behalf Of Fred
Sturm
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 1:57 PM
To: caut@ptg.org
Subject: Re: Workload-"condition"


Point very well taken, Scott. My apologies to my fellow cauts for an
ill-considered flaming post. Usually I let something like that sit on
the screen a while (tune a piano or whatever), before hitting the send
button. I was in a hurry and failed to do so.
	So again, my apologies, and I'll try to maintain a collegial and
cordial tone hereafter.
Regards,
Fred Sturm
University of New Mexico
Scott Thile wrote:
>
> With all do respect....
>
> Does anyone here remember the political fiasco and resulting flame war
that
> erupted on the pianotech listserv several years ago (I think it was in
'95 -
> '96 and lead up to the convention)? It eventually spawned the PTG-L so
that
> the rest of us could get on with our work. The tone of the posts is
starting
> to remind me that time on pianotech.