At 09:17 PM 2/7/2012, you wrote: >In perspective. > >When I was on the Board about 30 years ago, dues were due Jan 1st, >but dues notices were not sent out until Jan 31. Dues were >delinquent March 31. RVP's were notified in April that if a member >didn't pay by May 31, he/she would be dropped. In other words, a >member would be able to receive full benefits, including being able >to attend PTG sponsored seminars, and get the Journal for 5 months >before membership would be dropped. When the Board first brought up >the idea that we should send out dues notices before Jan 31, one >Board member actually said. "members will think the PTG is begging for money". > >The Board, and Council, finally got their act together when we hired >a management company to run our organization. Dues notices are now >sent out at the beginning of November, with a payment due date of >Jan 1st. The delinquent notices are sent out Jan. 31. By that time, >dues are already 30 over due. When you car insurance bill has not >been paid 1 week AFTER THE DUE DATE, you get a delinquency notice >from the insurance company. The PTG is sending out a delinquency >notice ONE MONTH after the due. date. How many days after the due >date should the HO wait until the delinquent notice is sent out? One >day, one week, a month? > >Bottom line. Not only are our dues collection process much more >efficient, members have 3 months to get their dues paid before a >delinquent notice is sent. If you don't want the hassle of dealing >with a slow program, much less getting a delinquency notice in the >mail, pay your dues early. Otherwise, shut the hell up. > >Wim > > >From: David Love <davidlovepianos at comcast.net> >To: pianotech <pianotech at ptg.org> >Sent: Tue, Feb 7, 2012 3:34 pm >Subject: Re: [pianotech] More Dues Paying Fiasco (Sigh.......) > >Do we really think that a couple of letters getting sent out >unnecessarily is breaking the bank? Time for a reality check. Is >business that slow or are people's lives that empty that this topic >continues in every possible ridiculous iteration. People should get >a life and move on. Really. Strip away the inessential. Life is too >short as it is. >David Love ><http://www.davidlovepianos.com/>www.davidlovepianos.com >(sent from bb) > >---------- >From: Jurgen Goering ><<mailto:pianoforte at pianofortesupply.com>pianoforte at pianofortesupply.com> >Sender: <mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org>pianotech-bounces at ptg.org >Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:16:07 -0800 >To: pianotech<<mailto:pianotech at ptg.org>pianotech at ptg.org> >ReplyTo: <mailto:pianotech at ptg.org>pianotech at ptg.org >Subject: [pianotech] More Dues Paying Fiasco (Sigh.......) > > >>The renewal was late enough that the system was set in motion to >>send out the letter. >Apparently little pre-mature, now, can we agree? > >>Moreover, who cares. A courtesy letter was sent out. His payment >>crossed. Common practice for any number of companies. What a waste >>of time and energy this entire discussion is. David Love > >And what about a waste of dues, yours, mine and everyone else's, >going into letterhead, envelopes, printing, stuffing envelopes, and >stamps to send people reminder notices for payment that has already >been recieved by head office??? >Jurgen Goering -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20120208/b53ca30a/attachment-0001.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC