[pianotech] Rebuilding criteria (yeah, I changed the subject.<G>)

Dale Erwin erwinspiano at aol.com
Wed Aug 1 20:49:55 MDT 2012


Can ya give one for refurbish.  
 Nowthis is my personal nebulous favorite.  YA know? It was refurbished? Now this can mean just about anything to anyone.
Thanks Bill


Dale Erwin R.P.T.
Erwin's Piano Restoration Inc.
 Mason & Hamlin/Steinway/U.S. pianos
www.Erwinspiano.com
Phone: 209-577-8397

 
  





-----Original Message-----
From: William Monroe <bill at a440piano.net>
To: pianotech <pianotech at ptg.org>
Sent: Wed, Aug 1, 2012 7:43 pm
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Rebuilding criteria (yeah, I changed the subject.<G>)


I think the problem with defining these terms is that they are so variable from piano to piano - it just depends upon what the piano needs.  For example, I use the following definitions (which I believer are from the Piano Book):



Repair: Fixing isolated or individual problems that a piano may have - e.g. a broken hammer shank, a non-functioning key.
Restoring/Reconditioning: Improving the overall quality of a piano by cleaning, lubricating, resurfacing, or replacing worn felts or leathers, but not replacing parts, per se.
Rebuilding: Improving the overall quality of a piano including new parts. Rebuilding may or may not involve refinishing the case.
Remanufacturing: Improving the overall quality of a piano, including new parts, soundboard, refinishing the case, and possibly making design changes.


You'll note, for example, the lack of reference to soundboard replacement in the rebuilding definition.  I don't think a soundboard has to be replaced for a piano to be considered fully (totally, completely, whateverly) rebuilt - others may disagree.  However, in some cases, the soundboard absolutely has to be replaced in order to consider an instrument rebuilt.  It just depends.  So I prefer to define these terms by virtue of the general process, the approach, rather than a specific list of items that must be included in order to consider the piano "rebuilt" (or remanufactured, or restored).



My 2 cents,
William R. Monroe










On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Encore Pianos <encorepianos at metrocast.net> wrote:

That was my attempt at humor.  I do think those terms should be standardized
as to what those terms would entail.  We can't help what our customers end
up thinking.

Will



-----Original Message-----
From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf
Of Joseph Garrett
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 8:49 PM
To: pianotech
Subject: [pianotech] Rebuilding criteria (yeah, I changed the subject.<G>)

Will Truitt said:
"I know what a REAL REBUILD entails, but I'm not telling, and you can't pry
it out of me...... :-)"

Will
Dagnabit! Thar it is! The same stuff.....nobody's talkin'!<G> This is an
age-old problem. Is there a possibility that,...maybe...WE could do
something about that?
Regards,
Joe


Joe Garrett, R.P.T.
Captain of the Tool Police
Squares R I






 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20120801/ee945471/attachment.htm>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC