Sorry, I should have been more specific. I was referring to the formula (popularized by Al Sanderson) for deriving a safe tension limit for music wire. Sanderson took this to be approximately 60% of the average breaking strength of the wire. This is the same formula discussed earlier by David Love: T(limit) = 0.557d^1.667. I rather thought this was obvious from the context of the discussion but apparently not. The breaking strength of wire as determined by test is generally given as a range and an average. For example, the breaking strength of Mapes IG No. 13 gage wire (U.S., or 0.031"/0.787 mm) ranges from 290 lbs (low) to 302 lbs (high) and averages 296 lbs. (The average is not necessarily the same as the low plus the high divided by two but the average of the breaking point of all of the samples tested.) By the above calculation the maximum safe tension for this wire is 170.6 lbs. For modern music wire I think this is overly conservative. Excluding the core wire of wrapped strings, in most pianos this is really an issue only through the top octave or so. Below that the working tensions are usually far enough below the elastic limit of the wire that string breakage due to overly taut strings is not an issue. (Except for the Sohmer 8' 4" grand which had a tension of 296 lbs at C-64 on a #16 1/2 wire [0.038"/0.965 mm]. C-52, with #18 wire (0.041"/1.041 mm) had a tension of 276 lbs and F-33, with #21 wire [0.047/1.194 mm] had a tension of 328 lbs.) >At 09:11 +0100 11/04/2011, you wrote: >>surely the only question worth asking is, do these pianos produce a >>better or a stronger sound in the high treble? >You didn't answer this question. No, I didn't. There is no easy "yes" or "no." As with most things having to do with piano design this is interactive. Short speaking lengths and small diameter wire--i.e., low tensions--work reasonably well with thin soundboards and bridges that are relatively narrow and not very tall. NY Steinways, for example, often have bridges that are quite narrow and often just 24 to 28 mm in height at C-88. There is not a lot of mass in these systems. When that gets translated into one of the Asian languages, however, it often comes out as thick soundboards and wider bridges that are in excess of 32 to 34 mm tall. Longer and higher-tensioned strings do work better in these systems. Longer strings in the high tenor also allow placement of the bridge a little further back, away from the treble soundboard liner--usually a good thing. ddf Delwin D Fandrich Piano Design & Fabrication 6939 Foothill Court SW, Olympia, Washington 98512 USA Phone 360.515.0119 Cell 360.388.6525 del at fandrichpiano.com ddfandrich at gmail.com -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of John Delacour Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 11:04 AM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] Breaking bass string At 09:00 -0700 11/04/2011, Delwin D Fandrich wrote: >It could also be that wire--generally--is tougher than it is given >credit for. The formula commonly used by scaling and/or rescaling >programs is one popularized by Al Sanderson and it is significantly >conservative. I'm not sure what wire specifications he based it on but >it gives a % of breaking strength that is considerably below that of >actual test with both Roslau and Mapes IG wire. There is only one fundamental formula for calculating the _tension_ of a string; it's not a question of opinion, and in my article at <http://pianomaker.co.uk/technical/string_formulae/> I extract practical methods from this one basic immutable formula. If anyone reaches different conclusions from the same data, then they are making a mistake somewhere because the laws of nature do not change. As to the strength of different gauge numbers of wire from various makers there is no absolute law, of course. The only certain way of determining this is by repeated tests on a specially designed machine, such as those used by Pleyel and Schiedmayer in the tests carried out on competing wires in the second half of the 19th century. Failing this we have to rely on the tensile strengths claimed by the wire makers. I have emphasized that the maximum of 70% **of the figures I gave in the table I posted earlier** in this thread is the maximum that I use for bass string manufacture using Röslau wire and I know from very long experience that if this percentage is exceeded there is a very real likelihood of the string's breaking. The evidence is presented to me weekly in the form of broken odd strings and broken strings in sets that I am asked to replace. My bass strings do not break, and they also sound good. In practice it is only for a small minority of pianos that I need to reduce tension with respect to the original tensions and experience seems to have taught hundreds of piano makers the same lessons as it has taught me. At 09:11 +0100 11/04/2011, I wrote: >surely the only question worth asking is, do these pianos produce a >better or a stronger sound in the high treble? You didn't answer this question. JD
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC