You'd think I'd have learned something the first time I responded....... well, here I go again....... Paul - I thought so. But gosh, you sure came out swinging! I'm quite sure Ed THOUGHT you charged one fee for the common folk and a different higher fee for the wealthy. THAT is why he jumped on you a little bit - in all honesty, I think just about anyone would IF they thought you were actually doing that. I'll bet this is how some wars have been started. We don't always need a Gulf of Tonkin or a USS Maine (the first one) - sometimes just a simple misunderstanding. ;-) Terry Farrell ducking and laying very, very low....... On Oct 31, 2010, at 4:59 PM, Paul T Williams wrote: > Thank You, Terry, That's exactly my point! > > Even my "normal" tuning rate outside work is higher than the other > techs, and IT SHOULD BE! the last thing I want to do when I leave > work is to tune yet another piano! I don't care if Im "better" than > other techs from my position, or not. I just don't want the extra > work: but, if they want ME to tune, then I'll tune it for the higher > rate. It just so happens that they're the higher end economic > situation folks and usually (re-emphasise usually) have nicer > pianos. (re-read the Balmer part of my last post...Top ten richest > in the world??? Lester spinet???? really!) $90 bucks and they were > all set! > > This is all stated right up front. If they go further, then I'm all > for it. > > Paul -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20101031/d371364c/attachment-0001.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC