William Truitt wrote: > HI Ron: > > If David's pianos had retained the original front duplexes, > then that would allow him to isolate the phenomena observed > a little more. The changed front duplexes are not offered > here as an alternative explanation per se. >Pertinent to > this discussion, I am noting only that the changed front > duplexes muddy the waters of our observations, in that we > have another change to contend with, when we would prefer > to isolate the observed phenomena as much as possible. You asked the question, it was a good question, and David answered that in his experience, having done it both ways, the duplex made no difference. It was in all cases the RC&S board that made the difference. This isn't muddying anything that I can see. >And you have offered your own > observation that it is consistent from board to board in > the killer octave area, and obviates the need to move the > strike line. As has David. >That's good enough for now and as much as we > can do anyway. I don't think I understand the purpose of this post, but at least the observations on strike lines as they relate to RC&S boards are out there now. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC