Ron, your blessing is nice thing to have, but quite unnecessary and having little cachet. I've got a baseline, and you helped, marginally, thanks. P In a message dated 8/28/2009 11:18:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time, rnossaman at cox.net writes: PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com wrote: > Honest response is that the distinction between an adequate, acceptable, > and fine tuning based on a radical pitch alteration is yet to be > established by you or anyone else. I have only tried to cast doubt on > anyone's capability to do "fine" tuning in one sitting after a radical > pitch alteration. I accept adequate, and acceptable. I do it all the > time. Another phrase--"fine enough". :-) Without letting the perfect get > in the way of the optimum. As good a tuning as you could have done without the pitch raise, as well as you yourself can determine at the time of the tuning. I've explained stability concerns, but these exist in regular tuning scenarios too. If that doesn't get it for you as a baseline, I'm not interested in playing the diversionary game with you any longer. Go forth and ponder the infinite quality of the perfect tuning at peace. You have my blessing. Ron N -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20090829/7da4b7f8/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC