Original pin block

[David Love]

I was referring to your suggestion (and Jon Page’s) about increasing length of the pin to 2 1/2".  The original Steinway pins I’m extracting are 2 3/8”.  The "typo" in the original text is probably an HTML conversion problem.  I still believe you should stay with the original length when increasing the diameter for the reasons stated.  People can, however, do whatever they want.  

David Love
davidlovepianos at comcast.net
www.davidlovepianos.com 
-----Original Message-----
From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of A440A at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 7:33 AM
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Re: Original pin block

Greetings, 

Gee, I gotta take exception,perhaps there was a typo??

David writes: 


You’ve received a couple of suggestion for going to 2 〓” pins as well as up a size and I think you need to be cautious about that unless you are reaming. If you don’t ream then the #3 (or larger) pin will extend deeper into the hole originally drilled for a #2 pin but was not reached and therefore expanded by the original pin. That can make the pin very tight at the bottom of the hole and can create some rendering problems. So, if going up in size in the original block I believe you should stick with the original length.<<

    As I see it, a #3 pin is no longer than a #2, so I don't understand the link between depth of wear and size of pin.  Also, it seems to me that most Steinway pianos use a 2 1/2" pin to begin with.  Did I miss something, here? 
regards, 


Ed Foote RPT
http://www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/index.html



**************
Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars.
(http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)