String noises revisited

[Allen Wright]

I replaced two agraffes on the most noticeable offenders today, and  
both notes were greatly improved; perhaps 60 - 70% less high whistle.  
The first one I replaced was on F#3, the note the customer was most  
annoyed by. That note was then so much quieter that the F next to it  
jumped out as being the worst, so I thought I'd better try it on that  
one as well. Obviously this could go on forever, and be quite time- 
consuming - so I've stopped it at that.

I do seem to notice some slight abrasions (in one of the holes  
especially) of the agraffes. The best guess I can make is that this  
noise, which is so common in that section of B's and D's, may be some  
kind of inherent scaling "characteristic" (tactful, no?) which is  
exacerbated by any imperfection in the corresponding agraffe. It's  
just not logical that this can only be related to agraffe problems;  
it wouldn't just be in that section.

Like so many things dealing with piano tone, I haven't found a black- 
and-white solution. But at least it's greatly improved - so that all  
the notes in that section have the same amount of this noise - and  
the customer knows I've gone the whole nine yards.

Allen Wright



On Jul 13, 2008, at 3:32 AM, Ed Sutton wrote:

> Allen,
> Not a lot of hope, short of redesigning the piano.
> The longitudinal partial is being excited by the combined energies  
> of the 7th and 8th partials.
> If you can get the hammer to strike at exactly 1/7th or 1/8th of  
> the string length, it may reduce the energy enough to stop the  
> sound. This may be the reason for the old design rule to strike at  
> 1/7th of the string length.
> On smaller pianos the longitudinal mode may be at the 17th or 19th  
> partials of plain wire strings.
> Ed Sutton
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Allen Wright
> To: Ed Sutton ; Pianotech List
> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 6:23 PM
> Subject: Re: String noises revisited
>
> Ed,
>
> This sounds like an exact description of what I'm dealing with.  
> Octave three - 15th partial - disappears with pitch change; all yes.
>
> I want to read Jim's book now....does he suggest any fix for this,  
> or is it a scaling problem (or simply unavoidable) or what?
>
> Allen
>
>
> On Jul 12, 2008, at 2:38 AM, Ed Sutton wrote:
>
>> Allen-
>> If I understand Jim Ellis' book, in a 7 foot grand piano,  
>> longitudinal mode noises will tend to occur in octave 3, and they  
>> will tend almost always to be at or near the frequency of the 15th  
>> partial. There will probably be a slight delay after the attack  
>> and before the sound develops. If you make slight changes in the  
>> pitch of the string, the longitudinal mode sound will not change  
>> pitch, but will disappear when the pitch has changed such that the  
>> modes that excite the longitudinal mode are outside of its  
>> resonance band.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20080716/f9d39bb5/attachment.html