Ron - I got carried away and was trying to be funny, maybe twisted. I didn't intend to focus on the propriety or intensity of your response. I don't mean to drag you, or Les, for that matter, into a continuation of unpleasantness. With regard to your question regarding university tech policy, the obvious venue would be CAUT, however, you've already gotten some reaction here. The reason why this may not be an entirely appropriate comparison is the motivation for such a division of labor. In the university, it delegates the over-sight and generates a personal sense of responsibility on the part of the individual technician. It is logical for reasons significantly apart from the specific effects of two tuners on a piano, as real as they might be. David Skolnik At 09:37 AM 7/6/2008, you wrote: >>Al - >>I read through them all again, just to make sure. I can't say that >>I'm seeing what you are. There were no personal attacks, expect >>maybe Ron's uncharacteristic tourettzian episode. Les' reputation >>is intact. He asked for advice, and I think he got some. >>David Skolnik > >Nothing tourettzian about it, and it was most certainly not an >attack of any sort. Having more than one tuner may not be the best >way to maintain stability in pianos, but it most certainly isn't >going to ruin them and Les knows that. > >Since I'm dragged back into this, I have a related question. In >universities that have two or more piano techs on the payroll, are >the pianos divided up among the techs so each instrument has only one tuner? >Ron N > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.4.5/1535 - >Release Date: 7/4/2008 5:03 PM
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC