JD / Dale
And here you have the real reason for doping hammers. Its a matter of
taste... purely subjective in nature and if done well will produce very
nice results that are somewhat different in end resulting sound.
There used to be a lot of folks trying to justify doping hammers by
asserting that you could get the same sound as needled hammers. I am
glad I dont hear this kind of thing anymore myself, because it really
isnt true to begin with, and secondly... who should need such a
justification to begin with ? Steinway NY states outright that they dont
get the sound they want without using soft hammers built up with lacquer.
Dale and I have had many a talk on this subject and tho we have
different preferences... I'm know for a fact he gets a very nice sound
out of his approach.
In the end... regardless of the strong opinions any of us hold... piano
voice and response is a very subjective thing that has nothing at all to
do with what the instrument was designed to do... what level of
loudness/harshness or softeness/mellowness is achieved. One persons
noise is anothers heavenly harp.
Cheers
RicB
JD
Don't shoot me yet or flambeau me. I may be the only lacquer
maverick in
the herd, but all the friendly & accurately assessed cynicism
aside, I find
a properly made Softer hammer with quality felt will illicit a tone
character
I find very attractive when treated lightly with a low dosage of
lacquer. To
my ear, this sound is difficult to replicate with hammers without
it.The
lacquer in this specific case doesn't render it un-needle-eable
un- less over
done.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC