YES!! Change the address before you "Reply To" JF On 5/29/07, Barbara Richmond <piano57 at insightbb.com> wrote: > > > Shouldn't this be on ptg-l? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Porritt, David > To: Pianotech List > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 7:31 AM > Subject: RE: Unbutting my nose ... > > > > > I hope this discussion of RPT vs. Associate doesn't start another round of > "lets be 'certified'". We've already started getting some traction with the > RPT lets not blow all that off for yet another title. > > > > dp > > > > > David M. Porritt > > dporritt at smu.edu > > ________________________________ > > > From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf > Of Tom Sivak > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 7:02 AM > To: tune4u at earthlink.net; Pianotech List > Subject: Re: Unbutting my nose ... > > > > > Alan Barnard <tune4u at earthlink.net> wrote: > > > CTT Certified Tuner/Technician (Yes, I like the old name better because > "Registered", as a term, really just means you are on someone's list. CTT > would be comparable to RPT and would CERTIFY that the Association considers > the person qualified in all respects to perform tuning, repairs, voicing, > and so forth, at a proven, professional level of competence.) > > > > > > > > > > I couldn't agree more. Heck, my dog is 'registered' with the village and > wears his tags to prove it! And, whereas, he is much better than other > dogs, this in itself only proves that I laid down $5 for his tags. > > > > > > The phrase "Registered Piano Technician" means nothing to the general > public. > > > > > > Tom Sivak (RPT) > > > Chicago
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC