Opps! You're right. I just hit reply without looking at where it was sent. Sorry! dp David M. Porritt dporritt at smu.edu ________________________________ From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Barbara Richmond Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 7:58 AM To: Pianotech List Subject: Re: Unbutting my nose ... Shouldn't this be on ptg-l? ----- Original Message ----- From: Porritt, David <mailto:dporritt at mail.smu.edu> To: Pianotech List <mailto:pianotech at ptg.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 7:31 AM Subject: RE: Unbutting my nose ... I hope this discussion of RPT vs. Associate doesn't start another round of "lets be 'certified'". We've already started getting some traction with the RPT lets not blow all that off for yet another title. dp David M. Porritt dporritt at smu.edu ________________________________ From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Tom Sivak Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 7:02 AM To: tune4u at earthlink.net; Pianotech List Subject: Re: Unbutting my nose ... Alan Barnard <tune4u at earthlink.net> wrote: CTT Certified Tuner/Technician (Yes, I like the old name better because "Registered", as a term, really just means you are on someone's list. CTT would be comparable to RPT and would CERTIFY that the Association considers the person qualified in all respects to perform tuning, repairs, voicing, and so forth, at a proven, professional level of competence.) I couldn't agree more. Heck, my dog is 'registered' with the village and wears his tags to prove it! And, whereas, he is much better than other dogs, this in itself only proves that I laid down $5 for his tags. The phrase "Registered Piano Technician" means nothing to the general public. Tom Sivak (RPT) Chicago -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20070529/1a8306bc/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC