Randy and List, I really don't know what the reason is--or IF there is a reason (and it's not simply a coincidence in the case of these two instruments). However, with regard to your notion, please note that the lower pitched, longer strings are at a LOWER elevation in the tenor (compared to the higher pitched, shorter srings at the other end of the agraffes at the tenor/treble break) but HIGHER in the capo (compared to the other end of the capo at C8). Alan Eder -----Original Message----- From: Randy Dinwiddie User <randy_chastain at sbcglobal.net> To: Pianotech List <pianotech at ptg.org>; caut at ptg.org Sent: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 1:16 pm Subject: Re: string height Alan, Would it be that the lower/longer note take more blow distance ie power to have a smooth transition and/or because the longer length of the wire being struck has a greater displacement? Interesting. Randy C On 6/7/07 9:59 AM, "reggaepass at aol.com" <reggaepass at aol.com> wrote: Hi Lists, We recently measured string heights on a Steinway B and Yamaha G2. An astute assistant noticed that on both pianos the highest note (pitch-wise) in the tenor was higher than the lowest note in the tenor (more than can be explained by the gradual decrease in wire diameters, were the agraffes all level) and that the lowest note in the capo (pitch-wise) was higher than the highest note (C8). Is it just a coincidence that we happen to measure two very different pianos with this same set-up, or is there an overarching design reason for this (making it a goal by design shared by many manufacturers)? Thanks, Alan Eder ------------------------------------------------------------ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000437> . ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. =0
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC