Big, fat, wide, shallow rib mystery "solved" ???????

Ric Brekne ricbrek@broadpark.no
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:22:39 +0100


Briar Rabbit writes:

I'm guessin' that the intent of this rib design is to maximize support, 
while retaining excellent elasticity, and that the grain orientation has 
a  lot to do with it. When you
pound these boards with your fist, they make an exceedingly gratifing 
"THUMmmmmmmmmmm"

Thump


Hey there Thumpy... been thinking on your post here wondering if there 
was some misunderstanding as to what you meant by this.  Seems like you 
are talking about stresses in two different directions at the same 
time.  I wanted to take a gander at my copy of Understanding Wood 
today... but didnt have time and forgot to bring it home with me.. sos I 
couldnt check out a couple questions I had.  I would guess that 
stretching two beams across a span one each in the two grain 
orientations you cite, that one would give more then the other... and I 
would guess this would be the <<pancaked>> (as you put it) orientation. 
But at the same time lengthwise I suppose their properties would be 
rather identical... seems self evident really.   I did get a chance for 
a realllllly basic (as in elementary) deflection test today... real 
uncontrolled and quite suspect to be fair... but just so.. .What I did 
was simply put lateral pressure on the ends of a small stick to see 
which way it bent when it first gave.... and sure enough... (also seems 
rather self evident) it always bent with the <<pancake>> direction. 

Now... I didnt get a chance to read what da book has to say on relevant 
controlled stress tests to so I'm not going to state anything 
authoritively... and it WOULD be a good idea to do some real digg'n to 
find out the straight skinny to be sure.... but if you are saying 
(amoung other things) that ribs with grain orientation horisontal vs 
vertical would have different overall support characteristics... then I 
suppose the (mine anyways) unschooled intuitive conclusion would tend to 
agree..  That said... I'll be the first to bow to any real proof to the 
contrary.... which should be easy enough to find one way or the other me 
thinks.

Cheers
RicB

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC