And you can hollow out the tail cove, and you can add weight by drilling holes in the moulding and installing lead. Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- > check out http://www.spurlocktools.com/id35.htm > > That's what you do when you can't match varying hammer weights with > varying shank weights to get a good average. > > I think Stanwood reaches deeper into the action. After all wood in the > whippens can can be different dimensions and weight too. I think he uses > springs. Then there's overweighted keys and misplaced capstans etc. > > Andrew Anderson > > At 06:58 PM 11/14/2005, you wrote: >>Ric Brekne writes: >> >> >The shank Strike weights showed a high of 2.06 grams and a >> >low of 1.40 That works out to about 3.5 grams of static >> >down weight at the key. The hammers themselves had a few >> >big jumps here and there and started off at a mid medium >> >curve with a nice bulge up to top medium in the mid treble >> >and again in the mid high treble. All in all I could >> >have ended up with a real interesting set of combined s >> >trike weights had I not spent the time matching shank >> >sw's to hammer dead weights. >> >>So how'd you match them? Big with small, big with big, or >>just trying to smooth out the bumps? Perhaps you could post >>the hammer and shank sw that you ended up with for each note? >> >>-Mark
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC