This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment First images of Overs no. 6I think Ron uses existing casework bought in = from Samick or Kawai to save a lot of trouble as it were. However, if = one were to build a case from scratch to match the shape of the = soundboard, the piano would look more like the fortepianos of yore, = which in my view is not a bad thing. They look more slender and elegant = to me.=20 One thing that I haven't been able to find out is what is the optimum = acreage of soundboard per unit length or frequency of string? AF ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Farrell=20 To: Pianotech=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:08 PM Subject: Re: First images of Overs no. 6 Looks like a gem Ron. Hard maple beams, belly rail & rim - man, that's = gotta be one heckuva solid foundation! One question though. A fish, or = treble cut-off, may be used to reduce the area of soundboard in the = treble area of an existing instrument. But if designing and building a = piano from scratch, and knowing of the desired = reduced-compared-to-traditional soundboard area in the treble, what = reason would there be to build the rim to traditional dimensions and add = a fish, rather than simply altering the shape of the rim during design & = building to reflect the desired smaller treble soundboard area - and = hence not needing a fish? The only reason I can think of is "because pianos are supposed to look = like that." And I suppose a rim adjusted to reflect the smaller treble = soundboard area would inspire too many questions? ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/cc/af/da/67/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC