DAG vs. 1708

Terry terry@farrellpiano.com
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:29:01 -0500


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/related attachment

------=_NextPart_001_0043_01C5324A.D3F5D7C0
Agree. No need for DAG. It's yucky and messy. And keeping things clean, =
lets that quarter-sawn-medula-ray beauty shine through!

Terry Farrell



> > Sooooo, no surface dressing on your bridges?  How finely sanded?  =
You find
> > it eliminates the need for DAG or the like?
> >=20
> > Respectfully,
> > William R. Monroe
>=20
>=20
> There never was a need for Dag, graphite, or any other sort of=20
> lubricant on bridge tops. Making them black does make it easier to=20
> see where you are when notching though.
> Ron N
------=_NextPart_001_0043_01C5324A.D3F5D7C0
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/80/10/4f/82/attachment.htm

------=_NextPart_001_0043_01C5324A.D3F5D7C0--

---------------------- multipart/related attachment
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 86743 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/37/f3/cc/06/attachment.jpe

---------------------- multipart/related attachment--



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC