Hey there Joe, thanks for the info. Joe Garrett wrote: > RicB wrote: > I havent ever fooled around with changing the height of the whippen > rail so > I would appreciate any input/advice any of you care to give." > > Ric, > At present, I'm making an action for an 1863, 8' Chickering. I'm using > Renner parts and Rick Wheeler Keys. One of the things that Rick > calculated, was that the Whippen Foot was too tall. I guess this is one of the things I am looking for then Joe, just what is the calculation for deciding the height of the whippen foot. Jim Ellis mentioned something along these lines in a private post to me and I'm sure its a valid enough variable... but I'm not going to start grinding off wood unless I know how much and why :) That said... these whippens have a pretty short foot as it were. When first I checked the cushion/capstan intersect was right at or barely above the line with the key at rest. So I suppose if anything the foot would have to be lengthened. I could probably replace with a bit thicker felt I suppose. That wouldnt hurt anyways as the origional felt was realllllly sloppily installed.. glue litterally everywhere... including on the felt that touches the capstan. Wonderful stuff :) Still, this has got me to thinking there must be a fairly straightforward way of calculating the height of the whippen center for a given action. Cheers RicB > I made a simple jig and ground those puppie off w/a radius. Then, the > under felt was attached. Next, was attaching the new whippen foot > felt. As I have found that the Renner Whippen Foot felt has two > problems, (too course & not stretched), this solved several problems. > Once that was done, Rick rated the action geometry at a 9+, (a scale > of 1-10, with 10 being optimum). As this is a retro-fit, that was the > best we could do. But, I know this sucker will play very nicely.[G] > Best Regards, > > Joe Garrett, R.P.T. > Captain, Tool Police > Squares R I
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC