---------------------- multipart/mixed attachment Hi Brad, I think in your case I would opt for the easiest way out and buy an =20 original set of Yamaha hammers, glued and all (complete hammer =20 assembly). First of all it is easy and saves you a lot of extra work and time, =20 and secondly, it always works out fine. It might be possible that you will have to move the action maybe 0,5 =20 to 1 mm to the front (in the treble), because I noticed that they =20 changed the hammer position slightly in the highest treble, or you =20 will have to take off a few hammers and re-glue them. The hammers Richard Brekne wrote about are not available in the US, =20 and the Ronsen hammers you will have to glue yourself on the new =20 shanks you have to order as well. Although the Yamaha hammers of today are not exactly the same as 20 =20 years ago, they are still of reasonable and predictable quality. The final outcome depends on one's skill, of course. friendly greetings from Andr=E9 Oorebeek R. Vinkeleskade 1-3hg 1071 SN Amsterdam The Netherlands tel/fax : 0031-20-6237357 gsm : 0031-645-492389 www.concertpianoservice.nl ---------------------- multipart/mixed attachment A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: EAR.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 17820 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/15/74/f1/0c/EAR.jpg ---------------------- multipart/mixed attachment and the stories I hear! On 18-dec-2005, at 0:20, Brad Smith, RPT wrote: > Hey, > I'm planning to install new hammers on a 20+ year old Yamaha C3. > Nice > piano, good power, just has worn out hammers and key bushings. > The least complicated thing to do is install Yamaha hammers, and in > this > case they would be 'pre-hung' from Yamaha onto new Yamaha shanks & > flanges. > > OR.... > I could install some other type of hammer, Renner, Abel, Wurzen > (haven't > tried yet) or even Steinway, onto the existing shanks/flanges to go > after a > different sound. > (Knuckles are decent enough to reuse existing shanks, even though I > would > rather just go with all new parts. ) > > Question is, does anyone have insights on the benefits of putting > different > hammers (i.e. non hard-pressed types) onto an > excellent Yamaha action? ( I love the precision of the Japanese/ > Yamaha, > but I also serve several pianists who are dyed in the wool Steinway > people. > who don't care for the tone of Asian hammers, even after careful- > balanced > voicing). > > I want to offer some different options to my customer, while being > careful > not to promise something I can't completely predict. > > I thought one possible course would be to offer them a different > sounding > hammer, onto their existing shanks/flanges, > and if we ultimately aren't satisfied with it, we could go back and > do the > uncomplicated Yamaha pre-hung hammers as originally planned. > It's a bit experimental, because I can't promise that they'll love it. > Because of that, I would offer them that option at a reduced > rate. My sense is that we might really end up with an incredible > piano, > with a wider dynamic range, but retaining the Japanese precision. > With a reduced rate, I feel I am 'compensating' the customer to > some degree > for taking some chances with me, on a more experimental strategy. > > What would you do? > I have a good relationship with this customer, and built up trust > enough > that they would stick with me through an 'experiment'. > I always try to be as upfront as possible about what I can promise and > predict...and what I cannot. > > Thanks in advance !! > > > Best regards, > Brad Smith, RPT > www.SmithPiano.com > <winmail.dat> > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives ---------------------- multipart/mixed attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC