Hi Don I think I clarified my position on the use of the phrase <<poor>> or <<poor piano>> in this regard pretty well. And since your...er... response lives on a different planet from that I dont really see pursuance your example below as productive. Seems to me a discusion about the need/desirability to practice on pianos with a variety of touch characteristics is a good and interesting one. Cheers RicB RicB Don wrote: >Hi Ric, > >If you like poor so well--I've got a goose neck piano hammer for you--with >a *really* worn non removeable tip. And I'll only charge you eleventy >million US dollars for it (shipping and batteries NOT included). *grin* It >would be perfect for that wonderful new Yamaha Piano! > >At 11:22 PM 25/09/2004 +0100, you wrote: > > >>To begin w ith... >>Mathew never got a chance to clarify what he meant by <<poor piano>>... >>at least not clearly... nobody really gave him a chance. Secondly... >>the truely <<poor piano>> side of the question is simply not interesting >>to discuss... tho perhaps entertaining from a food fight perspective if >>you get my meaning :). >> >>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC