I agree with this very much. I too find Tunelab 97 better for understanding what is going on. What I miss in Tunelab Pro is the ability to easily preserve the measured inharmonicity data for each partial. In Tunelab 97, those numbers became part of the saved file. In the Pro version, the data on individual partials is condensed into a single number which describes the string. Vladan =============================== Actually... the ability of TL97 to be used to generate tuning curves based on sampled partial information in the same maner as one conciously approaches an aural tuning has kept me using 97 over its later versions. A little understanding of tuning theory, and a basic understanding of how 97 works... and you can duplicate the ear approach very nicely all the while learning more and more about how partials fit together in the great puzzle of tuning. JMV RicB __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC