>One question comes to mind from the sketch of the transition bridge; is >this not in effect a hockey stick arrangement in disguise and why >manufacturers still use it, citing the same reasoning i.e. keeping as >large a distance between end of bass bridge and end of tenor bridge? > >Hope not to throw a cat amongst the pigeons! > >Alan Forsyth Not even close. This is, in fact, a real scale break. The change from the plain wire trichords on the long bridge to the wrapped bichords on the transition bridge is accompanied by an appropriate reduction in speaking length (which is why the transition bridge works and the hockey stick doesn't), that keeps the strings on the transition bridge at a reasonable tension and breaking%. Looking at the tension, impedance, inharmonicity and break% curves of a piano with a decently scaled transition bridge, and one with as good a compromise as can be expected with a hockey stick bridge and the differences will be obvious. Which manufacturers are these that are citing the intent of separating the bass and tenor for soundboard impedance control? I'm coming up on thirty years in the business and have never heard that from any manufacturer that I can recall. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC