OT Politicals

[Dean May]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
The 380 tons of high grade explosives contained no nuclear weapons. Some of
them were of a type that is used, in one of its applications, as the
triggering explosive in a nuclear device. That does not in any way indicate
that is what their intended use was. Many other components must be in place
to have a nuclear device and none were there.

Question: If it is bad for Iraq to have "weapons of mass destruction," why
is it okay for Israel, Pakistan, North Korea, China and the United States to
have them? The latter country, especially, since it is the only one in
history to detonate such devices in the midst of civilian populations,
killing hundreds of thousands.

Dean
Dean May             cell 812.239.3359
PianoRebuilders.com   812.235.5272
Terre Haute IN  47802

-----Original Message-----
From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org]On Behalf
Of Alpha88x@aol.com
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 3:22 PM
To: pianotech@ptg.org
Subject: Re: OT Politicals




I am confused. I thought they said Bush lied about weapons of mass
destruction being in Iraq.  Then today, they said that of the 380 tons of
materials, a portion of it was the type of explosives that were necessary
components to make/detinate nuclear weapons.

          Aren't nuclear weapons weapons of mass destruction?

Julia
Reading, PA


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/ae/3f/82/59/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--