So, how is that different than my 20's Sohmer? Mine has agraffes on the long bridge only and standard bridge pins for the top two octaves. I wanted to use wound strings on the first 6 notes above the break so I had to enlarge the agraffe holes a bit. I hardly think an agraffe should be considered a clamp. I have long thought about bridge termination and will soon have a prototype of a novel approach. To spare myself from embarrassment I'll not describe it until I try it out. Carl Meyer Ptg assoc Santa Clara, Ca. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Brekne" <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 1:06 AM Subject: Re: Stuart > Come on Carl... grin.. how many times have we talked about Stuarts > bridge agraffes ? > > RicB > > Carl Meyer wrote: > > > > > >>Australia's Stuart & Sons grand pianos use a different string clamp to > >>traditional grand piano and so they play notes that produce sounds with > >>more purity, sustain and volume. > > > > > > > > > > A different string clamp?? I thought the attachment would show that but I > > can't open it. I'd be interested in seeing the "different string clamp" > > Could that be an answer to our archaic string termination problems. "More > > Ovaltine please!!!" > > > > Carl Meyer Ptg assoc > > Santa Clara, Ca. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC