Evidence of overlacquered hammers

[David Love]

OK, try putting hammer number 88 on note number 1 and see if you can
tell the difference.   

David Love
davidlovepianos@comcast.net 

-----Original Message-----
From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] On
Behalf Of Bernhard Stopper
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 8:22 AM
To: Pianotech
Subject: Re: Evidence of overlacquered hammers

Ron wrote:
>
> And what David said, and what I said is that no choice of hammer that
you
> can make will get more out of the system than the soundboard has to
give.
>

no, the point was that David said that it´s possible by taking a heavier
hammer to produce more energy.
and that´s not true when all other parameters remain unchanged.

regards

Bernhard


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Nossaman" <rnossaman@cox.net>
To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: Evidence of overlacquered hammers


>
> >But for me no. The hammer and string is the first component pair that
has
to
> >match to achieve the kind of the spectrum to be produced.
> >The soundboard/string components is the second pair that must match
to
> >achieve the kind of the filtered spectrum to be produced.
>
> And what David said, and what I said is that no choice of hammer that
you
> can make will get more out of the system than the soundboard has to
give.
>
>
> >But there is no direct hammer/soundboard relation without taking
attention
> >of the first hammer/string relation.
>
> Add all the details you like. That doesn't make what we said any less
true.
>
> Ron N
>
> _______________________________________________
> pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives

_______________________________________________
pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives