This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Hi, that is funny because all comments when I read them lend to the same result more or less, but with different methods . I just wanted to say that deep needling at 9h30 10:30 , if overdone, kills too much of the "bottom power" of the hammer, and when it have been done (as you say) yet, better leave those regions untouched if unsure of what we do. Usually in those German factory they voice all the necessary stitches in the shoulders (when the voicer is not too tired !) and the basic preparation of the hammer have been well done. However, may be they produce something adapted to the American taste and use the Renner blue hammer for that reason, I believe you should have less density in the tone with those hammers, as less of the lower felt regions an be employed to power the tone. But I just have seen a few samples of renner blue line hammers. Roger comments on the duplex treatment is first class ! I'll add that working with 3 needles and more force mean more result , so less needling (but more sore on the arms often !) ZIngling = mating + power check & boost is indeed the first reflex, that is the way old Steinway are tweaked so to get rid of all capo noises. Best to all. Isaac OLEG After creating some resilience by deep needling in the 9:30 - 10:30 and 1:30 - 2:30 shoulder of the hammer (this may have already been done), to eliminate noise in the capo section, deep needle from 10:30 - 11:30 and from 12:30 to 1:30. Aim for a point where the felt joins the moulding on each side of the hammer. That will put the needle parallel to the moulding at the 11:30 and 12:30 position and angled slightly in toward the moulding as you move away from the strike point. Stay away from and don't stitch under the crown. Use a single needle and insert it to it's full length, 8 mm's or so. Be sure that the hammer has a good shape and is not flattened on the top. Do not mute the duplex, it will kill the tone too much. Don't voice this section in isolation. Check back and forth against the tenor section to keep the piano balanced. David Love davidlovepianos@earthlink.net ----- Original Message ----- From: To: pianotech@ptg.org Sent: 3/5/2004 8:21:59 PM Subject: Seiler 180 voicing, frontscale noise questions Liszt, I have a job coming up where I'll be working on a Seiler 180(5 10" grand). I'll be at it all day, easing, lubing, regulating, tuning, and voicing. These are really well-built German pianos, with Renner blue hammers, and full Renner actions, etc., etc. I'm sure someone on this list has experience with these pianos. I've worked on quite a few, but not to this extent. I've tuned many, and done minor regulations on several, but have never voiced one. I'm actually surprised that nobody has asked me to voice because there are some really harsh overtones that emanate from the piano above the treble break. I've muted some in the past by lacing felt through the strings and wedging it under the capo bar, with some success. The customer knows about this method, but would prefer it voiced down, or so he says. My main concern in th! is whole deal is that I've seen the results of a tech trying to "voice down" that section on a different piano. The hammers are ruined. They look like pin cushions, and sound like them too. Can anyone offer advice on the voicing of these instruments? M. Orobeek?? Anyone?? I've got a call in to the Seiler rep. I'm certain he's heard this complaint before. I'm curious what the company has to offer in terms of a fix. Thanks in advance for any and all input, Dave Stahl ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/9f/65/a4/c8/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC