This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment So the resilience may be adapted in regards of the hardness, the weight and also the resilience of the object that is contacted , Indeed if the ball rebound, that mean the energy get reflected to the ball. In the hammer we want some to be given to the strings as well is not it ? Best Isaac OLEG -----Message d'origine----- De : pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org]De la part de Erwinspiano@aol.com Envoye : vendredi 23 avril 2004 00:30 A : pianotech@ptg.org Objet : Re: Acetone In a message dated 4/21/2004 10:58:19 PM Pacific Standard Time, Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no writes: btw... Whats Delwins take on hammers and laquer ? Seem to remember he went further then we do over here for the natural hammer resiliancy side. No... this is one of those typical <<opinions vary>> questions....and so it should be :) Cheers Dale ! RicB Ric Right you are.! It all depends on whos defining resieliency Know what I mean. A steel ball is the most reslient when bounced off cement. It probaly expends the least amount of energy per bounce than the super ball or a felt hammer. Cheers back at ya Dale ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/a7/5a/08/41/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC