This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:40:25 +0200 Richard Brekne <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no> writes: > All this because its so hard to deal with somebody saying... it just doesnt add up... go figure. Richard - As the one who started this thread out of concern for pronounced ridges in a new Baldwin, I feel compelled to make an observation here. I don't have the SLIGHTEST idea what it is you are actually aguing for or against! From my perspective, Del and Ron have been 100% consistent with regard to their views on CC vs. RC boards for many years now. Put as concisely as I can, this is my "Cliff Notes" version: 1. Many CC boards sound great for many many years, including those in Steinways of all eras 2. Many CC boards exhibit structural problems very early on, including those in Steinways of all eras 3. They think the odds of it sounding great longer should and can be better. 4. The RC board is an alternative that they feel addresses that. 5. There has never been any claims that I recall regarding superior tone of either, given healthy boards of each. 6. Good reasoning has been given countless times. 7. There has never been any claim that every CC board is doomed to early failure Say goodnight, Gracie.... Mark Potter bases-loaded@juno.com ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/71/35/9f/02/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC