---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Delwin D Fandrich wrote: > > I make my comments about the cross-section of the hammershank only because > so many seem interested in using relatively massive hammers in an effort to > gain more power. Until the hammershank flex problem is dealt with this > won't really do much good beyond messing up the overall feel of the action. > At least it won't achieve the desired results. > > Del > > Actually... I am personally moving steadily away from a preference for heavier hammers. But I am very curious as to why this particular combination of heavy hammers, high ratio, low key mass, and lots of assist spring help seems to be so well recieved at our conservatory. And otherwise curious about the various moments that affect action dynamics, and what role they play in different configurations. -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/a3/e4/00/a2/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC