Thanks Mark. Always a pleasure to hear your thoughts. So you dont think there is any comparison between the Wapin concept and the general idea of bridge agraffes ?... or were there just to many variables to be able to comment really on the comparison ? I read your reply to Ron O with interest as well... you have doubts as to the longevity of Stuarts ?.. How old is the oldest one... I suppose I can take a look at his website or as Ms Stuart... but if you happen to know off hand.. It will be interesting to see how they hold up. As far as him getting on with the rest of the techs... I know others have a different perspective... and not knowing him personally I have to reserve a bit here... but it does seem from my viewpoint that many folks in the buisness from his end have, for whatever reasons, become defensive to the point of ofte times seeming arrogant. Kind of easy to understand given the grilling they get from just about every corner they turn. I envy their strength to hold up under it all when it comes down to it... but yes... it would be nice if they were all a bit more inclusive. But me thinks thats a double sided coin if you get my meaning. Anyways... I'd like to hear more of your thoughts on the Wapin. Would you recommend, aside from cost issues, the modification to just about any piano ?... Cheers RicB Mark Bolsius wrote: > Hi Ric, > > Yes I have done the Wapin thing...but only once a few years ago on an > old(ish) Yamaha U1 as a low cost experiment. I haven't persued the concept > in my rebuilding here in Australia...too hard to sell a concept no-one's > heard of, and the licensing fees added a bit of a whack to the overall job. > Our dollar was miserable against the mighty greenback at the time. > > The trial piano was indeed a changed piano - I like a lot! but there were > too many factors changed in it to be absolutely sure that Wapin made the big > changes. To compare this piano with the Stuart is folly. > > And for the same reasons , it's difficult to really know for sure whether > it's the aggraffes, the nil crown s/board, short ribs, scale design etc etc > in the Stuart that give it that different sound. > > I know the hammers must be a part of it as well! I've just remembered that > he uses Abels....but they're unlike anything I've seen before. The underfelt > is really minimal and the shape is a little different...a photo would tell > the story better than I can describe...maybe one of the Sydney list lurkers > can send a digital image ?... > > I wish him well, I only wish he'd have a little more to do with the rest of > the industry here. He's got a real attitude against the Guilds here and what > they stand for, and as a result, most tuners don't know or want to know what > he's about. > > Cheers > Mark Bolsius > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC