---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 9/6/2003 1:47:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
donmannino@comcast.net writes:
> Subj: Re: Steinway M
> Date: 9/6/2003 1:47:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> From: <A HREF="mailto:donmannino@comcast.net">donmannino@comcast.net</A>
> Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> To: <A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet
>
Don
Excellent advice with a balanced opinion, Well said. I've fallen
in that one myself.
Dale
>
>
> Tom,
>
> I would advise that you not comment to your client on the design of the
> piano, but stick to what your client wants - an evaluation of the instrument
> itself, the condition, and whether it seems to be priced properly.
>
> There are lots and lots of opinions expressed here and other places about
> what is good or bad in a piano design, but all of these are really meaningless
> when it comes to personal choice in a piano. I have played and rebuilt many
> Steinway Ms, and have had good and bad ones just like any other model. I am
> not a fan of "compression crowning" of soundboards, but how many fantastic
> pianos have been made with this system in mind?
>
> The temptation is to feel the need to direct the client towards a piano that
> is your choice. If the client calls and asks for that advice, then you
> should give it of course. When evaluating an instrument for someone, though, it
> will keep things simpler for you and your client if you stick to evaluating
> that instrument, and not editorializing too much.
>
> Don Mannino RPT
>
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/53/0e/e9/0c/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC